← All capabilities

Attack Simulation

Test how an attacker could get in

Discuss this capability
Authorised attack simulation showing a marked attack path and exploit points
Attack Simulation · specialist capability

How this capability helps

Test how an attacker could reach the systems and data that matter.

Scanner findings, configuration warnings, threat reports and audit actions can leave teams with a long list of possible weaknesses. Attack simulation tests how an attacker could combine them and whether the activity would be detected.

The exercise must be authorised, use agreed safety limits and cover the systems an attacker could target. Specialists test weaknesses, help prioritise the fixes and retest them to establish whether the attack path has been closed.

01

What it covers

  • Web, API, mobile and infrastructure testing
  • Cloud, identity and Active Directory attack paths
  • Red-team, social-engineering and security-architecture exercises
02

When this helps

  • No adversarial test has run in the last year
  • Testing is limited to compliance scans
  • A major platform, acquisition or architecture change is planned
03

What you receive

  • Evidence gathered within agreed safety limits and prioritised fixes
  • Findings on detection and response for each attack path
  • Retest results showing whether the fixes work

Where delivery can go wrong

Specialists need clear responsibilities and a way to resolve decisions that affect each other.

Problems arise when the right expertise is missing or nobody coordinates the work between specialists.

01

Relying on a scan alone

Automated scans can cover many systems. They cannot show how a person could combine weaknesses or adapt an attack as conditions change.

02

Testing too narrow a scope

Testing one application may miss the identity, cloud or supplier access that an attacker could use to reach it.

03

Findings remain unresolved

Findings can remain in a backlog unless someone owns each fix, the associated risk decision and the retest.

How the process works

Follow each stage to see the decisions and checks needed to complete the work.

The diagram opens with the whole process in view. Zoom in for detail, then drag or scroll within the frame.

Attack Simulation process diagram. A general testing process: agree safe rules, prove which attack paths work, check whether defenders notice and retest the fixes to a defined closure point.
Read the process step by step
  1. Test objective approved.
  2. Set scope, rules of engagement and safe limits.
  3. Material attack path proven?
    • If no: Record controls that held and residual observations. Test evidence issued.
    • If yes: Demonstrate impact safely and preserve evidence. Continue to the next decision.
  4. Was the activity detected?
    • If no: Close detection gaps and update playbooks.
    • If yes: Validate response and containment.
  5. Retest the fixes.
  6. Closure evidence issued.
1

Rules of engagement

Agree explicit authority, boundaries, stop conditions and protected contacts before testing begins.

2

Attack path

Assess each finding against what an attacker could achieve and the impact on the business.

3

Retest

Retest the fix before recording the attack path as closed.

How Musketeers coordinates the work

Musketeers keeps the client and specialist teams working to the same plan.

Specialists deliver the technical work. Musketeers coordinates their involvement, tracks decisions and dependencies, and keeps the evidence available until the work is complete.

  1. 01Define the business objective and safe boundaries
  2. 02Coordinate the offensive testing, cloud and identity specialists needed
  3. 03Assign the fixes and track them through retesting