
How this capability helps
Your policies need evidence that the controls work in practice.
Cyber governance helps the organisation make consistent decisions and explain them. People need to understand the policies, controls need to put them into practice, and the board needs evidence that this is happening.
AI adds new tools, data flows and third parties that existing approval processes may struggle to keep up with. Cyber & AI GRC helps teams identify their obligations and decide what needs to change.
What it covers
- Cyber-risk and regulatory assessments
- AI governance, control ownership and evidence
- vCISO, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA and assurance programmes
When this helps
- Policies exist but evidence is fragmented
- Frameworks compete for the same teams and controls
- AI use is growing faster than governance
What you receive
- A prioritised assessment of risks and obligations
- Named control owners and clear evidence requirements
- Decisions explained for the board and a practical improvement plan
Where delivery can go wrong
Specialists need clear responsibilities and a way to resolve decisions that affect each other.
Problems arise when the right expertise is missing or nobody coordinates the work between specialists.
Starting with the framework alone
Following a generic framework can create work without identifying the gaps that matter most to the business.
Advice without the necessary expertise
AI, privacy and operational resilience each need specialist judgement. A broad service list does not establish that expertise.
Evidence falls out of date
Controls may work during an audit, then lose clear ownership or current evidence between reviews.
How the process works
Follow each stage to see the decisions and checks needed to complete the work.
The diagram opens with the whole process in view. Zoom in for detail, then drag or scroll within the frame.
Read the process step by step
- New obligation or control gap.
- Scope the requirement, data and accountable owner.
- In scope now?
- If no: Record the reason and monitor for changes. Assessment complete for now.
- If yes: Gather evidence for each required control. Continue to the next decision.
- Control effective?
- If no: Remediate the gap and retest.
- If yes: Approve the evidence and record the responsible owner.
- Prepare the evidence pack and agree reviews.
- Assessment and evidence up to date.
Scope
Which entities, services, data and AI uses does the assessment cover?
Ownership
Name the person responsible for each control and each decision to accept risk.
Proof
Keep evidence current and accessible so it can support the assessment.
How Musketeers coordinates the work
Musketeers keeps the client and specialist teams working to the same plan.
Specialists deliver the technical work. Musketeers coordinates their involvement, tracks decisions and dependencies, and keeps the evidence available until the work is complete.
- 01Map the applicable obligations to the controls
- 02Agree who makes each decision and what evidence they need
- 03Review the programme when risks or regulations change
